Facilities services tender · Gauteng
“The auditor traced each figure back to the prescribed schedule and found that mobilisation had been included twice in two workstreams. The register made the correction straightforward and showed us which narrative table also needed updating.”
The bidder supplied a complete pack four business days before close. Our review identified duplicated mobilisation, a VAT-inclusive supplier quote treated as exclusive, and headcount that differed between the staffing plan and budget. The client corrected the commercial forms and returned one controlled revision for reconciliation.
Community programme submission · KwaZulu-Natal
“There were more queries than we expected, and the last review call was demanding. Still, the questions exposed unsupported travel assumptions and gave our board a much clearer basis for approving the final amount.”
The organisation’s budget was arithmetically sound, but travel frequency and facilitator days did not agree with the programme schedule. We did not decide the delivery model; the programme lead clarified it, finance updated the cost build-up, and we verified the revised totals.
Built-environment consultancy framework · Western Cape
“The prescribed form rounded rates differently from our workbook. Scheduler Flowcore isolated the resulting variance and checked every transfer after we corrected the formula.”
This was a targeted reconciliation rather than a full audit. The work covered three price schedules, VAT treatment and the final offer total. Technical methodology and resource suitability remained outside scope.
Client names and tender identifiers are withheld because commercial submissions are confidential. Examples are presented with permission and limited to the audit work performed.